![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
WTO Ministerial Conference - 17 September 2003 WTO Ministerial Conference - 17 September 2003 Mr. David Curry (Skipton and Ripon): If we were really five or six hours away from an agreement on agriculture, the break-up of the talks is inexplicable. The Secretary of State was right to point to the danger of allowing bilateral trade agreements to take over from multilateral agreements. The principal protagonist in that is the United States, an example being the proposed all-Americas trade agreement. What influence can the United Kingdom exert on President Bush to emphasise the primacy of a rules-based multinational approach to trade? As we approach the expiry of the peace clause, is there not a danger of a spate of extremely angry and violent disputes in the WTO, which would make the situation worse? Ms Hewitt: The right hon. Gentleman draws attention to an important
issue: the expiry of the peace clause at the end of December. It is curious
that no one mentioned the peace clause at Cancun. Following its expiry,
all the trade-distorting agricultural arrangements could be subject to
trade disputes in the WTO settlement procedure. That may prove to be the
most powerful lever available to all of us who want the round to make
progress, ensuring that everyone returns to the negotiating table and
proceeds on the basis of the compromises that were beginning to emerge
at Cancun.
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
David Curry MP | House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA | tel: 020 7219 6202 |
||||||||||||||||||